Pascal

注册日期:2014-10-22
访问总量:10963880次

menu网络日志正文menu

今日伊朗将是明天的中国.AI:请继续坚守街头勇敢地反抗压迫政权


发表时间:+-

image.png


image.png



image.png


image.png

https://x.com/whyyoutouzhele/status/2006006107316314391






                 我正义人民解放军空军

                   文明反击野蛮台湾鬼子   



            倒查万维博客群体

            是谁一口咬定为中共无人机?




                   激情四射的小学生们




              ChartGPT  越用越傻 !   
image.png

image.png

长时间使用人工智能 (AI) 并不会提升大脑功能,反而可能使其

变得迟钝。

超过四个月的认知数据表明,我们衡量生产力的方式可能完全

错误 ??

在 MIT 的研究中,参与者在使用 ChatGPT 时接受了脑部扫描。

→ 83.3% 的用户无法回忆起几分钟前写过的任何一句话。

→ 相比之下,那些不使用 AI 的用户则能轻松记住。

大脑连接性急剧下降——从 79 分降至 42 分。

→ 这意味着神经参与度下降了 47%。

→ 这是所有用户群体中认知表现最低的。

即使在之后的会话中停止使用 ChatGPT,这些用户的参与度

仍然很低。

→ 他们的表现仍然低于从未使用过 AI 的用户。

→ 这表明的不仅仅是依赖性——而是认知能力的下降。

除了扫描结果之外,教育工作者还对写作本身提出了质疑。

→ 文章在技术上无可挑剔,但常常被批评为“机械”、“缺乏

灵魂”和“缺乏深度”。

矛盾之处在于:

→ ChatGPT 能让你完成任务的速度提升 60%……

→ 但它却将学习所需的脑力消耗降低了 32%。

表现最佳的群体是?

→ 那些一开始没有使用人工智能,后来才开始使用的人。

→ 他们保持了最佳的记忆力、大脑活动水平和整体得分。

使用 ChatGPT 会让你感觉充满力量——但它也可能在不知不觉

中让你的思维被“卸载”。

→ 你提高了速度,但失去了专注力。

→ 你得到了答案,但却停止了学习如何思考。

关键不在于回避人工智能——而在于有意识地使用它。

→ 用它来辅助,而不是取代你的思维。

→ 培养认知能力——而不是依赖它。

麻省理工学院早期关于人工智能与大脑的研究阐明了其中的风

险。我们使用这类工具的方式比以往任何时候都更加重要。


MIT recently completed the first brain-scan study on ChatGPT users—and the results are deeply revealing. Rather than boosting brain function, prolonged AI use may be dulling it. Over four months of cognitive data suggest we might be measuring productivity all wrong ??In MIT’s study, participants had their brains scanned while using ChatGPT. → 83.3% of users couldn’t recall a single sentence they’d written just minutes earlier. → In contrast, those writing without AI had no trouble remembering. Brain connectivity dropped sharply—from 79 to 42 points. → That’s a 47% drop in neural engagement. → The lowest cognitive performance among all user groups. Even after stopping ChatGPT use in later sessions, these users showed continued under-engagement. → Their performance remained lower than those who never used AI. → This suggests more than dependency—it’s cognitive weakening. Beyond the scans, educators flagged the writing itself. → Essays were technically solid, but often called “robotic,” “soulless,” and “lacking depth.” Here’s the paradox: → ChatGPT makes you 60% faster at completing tasks… → But it reduces the mental effort required for learning by 32%. The top-performing group? → Those who began without AI and added it later. → They retained the best memory, brain activity, and overall scores. Using ChatGPT can feel empowering—but it may quietly offload your thinking. → You gain speed, but lose engagement. → You get answers, but stop learning how to think. The takeaway isn’t to avoid AI—but to use it intentionally. → Use it to assist, not replace your mind. → Build cognitive strength—not dependency. MIT’s early study on AI and the brain lays out the stakes. The way we use these tools matters more than ever.


🧠 MIT recently completed the first brain-scan study on ChatGPT users—and the results are deeply revealing. Rather than boosting brain function, prolonged AI use may be dulling it. Over four months of cognitive data suggest we might be measuring productivity all wrong ?? In MIT’s study, participants had their brains scanned while using ChatGPT. → 83.3% of users couldn’t recall a single sentence they’d written just minutes earlier. → In contrast, those writing without AI had no trouble remembering. Brain connectivity dropped sharply—from 79 to 42 points. → That’s a 47% drop in neural engagement. → The lowest cognitive performance among all user groups. Even after stopping ChatGPT use in later sessions, these users showed continued under-engagement. → Their performance remained lower than those who never used AI. → This suggests more than dependency—it’s cognitive weakening.

https://x.com/lex_is_lex_/status/2005870980237803541

      世界音乐史上最潇洒美丽的女指挥   
   


浏览(92)
thumb_up(0)
评论(0)
  • 当前共有0条评论