汤安

注册日期:2011-09-09
访问总量:477271次

menu网络日志正文menu

zt Google 全部“照办” 谷歌"被迫"向美国政府提交用户数据


发表时间:+-

 

 

谷歌"被迫"向美国政府提交用户数据


  时间:2011-11-07 07:04:55  来源: 综合报道  点击:158次  [ 大  中  小 ]

《华尔街日报》近日报道,美国政府曾凭借秘密的法院指令,要求谷歌公司和另一个较小的互联网服务提供商索尼克(Sonic)公司提交维基解密 网站志愿者雅各布·阿佩尔鲍姆的电子邮件(Gmail)账户信息。

《华尔街日报》称,美国政府要求谷歌和索尼克上交的信息包括阿佩尔鲍姆登 录他Gmail账户的IP地址以及在过去两年中与阿佩尔鲍姆通信的人的电子邮件地址等。索尼克公司曾提起上诉,但官司失败,他们只好向政府提交了有关信 息。谷歌则拒绝发表评论。

现年28岁的阿佩尔鲍姆因被指与维基解密网站关系密切已经成为美国警方监控目标,并频频在机场准备出入境时遭到美 国海关以及安全人员拘留和审问。美国《赫芬顿邮报》称,阿佩尔鲍姆去年8月曾在新泽西州纽瓦克机场被扣3小时,他随身带的笔记本电脑遭搜查,3部手机被收 缴。

据报道,2009年,谷歌开始公开他们从政府部门收到的要求公开用户信息的情况。在当年12月31日之前的6个月中,谷歌共收到了 4601次请求,并且几乎全部“照办”。

 

 

方鲲鹏: 谷歌自诩不作恶“避税”邪门赛过洗钱专家 2011-07-21 18:55:28





共产主义理论兴衰史预告了普世价值论的未来(3

 

作 者: 方鲲鹏

 

三、 谷歌自诩不作恶“避税”邪门赛过洗钱专家

 

zt

变天了!Google最终向美国政 府交出了维基解密志愿者的Gmail数据


送交者: zippers 2011年10月19日00:20:22

Gmail users got a hefty dose of reality today when it was revealed that Google handed over one user's private data to the U.S. government, who requested it without a search warrant.

The contacts list and IP address data of Jacob Appelbaum, a WikiLeaks volunteer and developer for Tor was given to the U.S. government after they requested it using a secret court order enabled by a controversial 1986 law called the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, according to the Wall Street Journal. The law allows the government to demand information from ISPs not only without a warrant, but without ever notifying the user.

A word from our sponsor:

ZOHO CreatorEvery day Zoho Creator helps hundreds of businesses build applications for their custom needs. Zoho Creator makes Data Collection, Analysis and Reporting a breeze. It also lets users specify workflow and business rules to make their application robust. Sign up for free!

Ad powered by BTBuckets

Sonic.net, a smaller ISP who was also asked to hand over data related Appelbaum, tried to challenge the order in court, but ultimately lost and was to give up the information. It's not known if Google resisted the request, but both companies did try to ensure that Appelbaum could at least be made aware of the data retrieval.

According to the company's own Transparency Report, Google received 4,601 user data requests from the U.S. government in the second half of 2010, and it complied with 94% of them. Those requests include warrantless inquiries as well as those accompanied by a search warrant.

Some Troubling Implications

The idea of an ISP handing over user data to governments without the aid of a search warrant has some troubling implications for privacy advocates and civil liberties proponents.

In the WikiLeaks case, the line between advocates and participants in the transfer of data can sometimes be blurry. If in its ongoing investigation into WikiLeaks the U.S. Department of Justice is free to ask Google, Twitter or Facebook for private data without users' knowledge, who's to say they can't access private information about people who have merely expressed sympathy for the organization?

Tech companies haven't necessarily rolled over and played dead on the issue. When the DoJ made a similar WikiLeaks-related request of Twitter in December, the company succeeded in having the order unsealed, meaning it was able to notify users about the request.

Google is among a number of tech companies that are asking Congress to rethink the law in light of the unexpected ways in which the Web has evolved in the last several years.


 



  为什么不能把Google打下去?  /无内容 - tongpai 10/19/11 (0)
  古狗本来就是配合美国政府对别国进行颠覆活动,不保护隐私了?  / 无内容 - m1a3 10/19/11 (2)


米鳖基督教科学箴言报赞TB一 党 专 政 优于美国政体。

http://www.csmonitor.com/Commentary/Global-Viewpoint/2011/1017/China-s-political-system-is-more-flexible-than-US-democracy


China's political system is more flexible than US democracy

Many people believe the Western democracy is superior to a one-party system because the rotation of political power gives government the flexibility to make needed policy changes. But China’s one-party system has proven over time to be remarkably adaptable to changing times.

 

本贴由【无聊的时间】于2011-10-19 10:31:15发表
浏览(848)
thumb_up(0)
评论(4)
  • 当前共有4条评论
  • 汤安
    谢谢白凡兄,那篇的立意很有意思,美国也在穷则思变呵,文章长了一些,看上去也没去认真了解中国的体制。天气变得太快,脑子光想着周末度假了,懒得译它了。

    不过,我一直难忘一个研究爱滋病流行问题的美国老教授的震撼报告,他非洲美洲两边跑了20年,报告结束时失望地说:"如果没有中国那样的集中制度,爱滋病难以预防,-----如果我们有中国的制度",他两手大声一拍,"啪!"----- "问题解决了!"。他解释说非典SARS(传染性非典型肺炎,Severe Acute Respiratory Syndromes)和禽流感无法在中国流行开来是因为中央政府头一天说要控制,第2天全国就能行动,要是美国? "我们只能说幸运的是,SARS没有在美国暴发"。

    其实只是媒体不报,美国黑人高中生里面"少女48%的性病率",白人女孩十岁体检开始医生提供爱滋病和其他性病疫苗,印地安保留地更是连爱滋病都没法控制(平均一个男青年有10个性伴侣)。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 白凡
    你后加的这篇文章很有意思,应该全文翻译出来,介绍给中文读者。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 汤安
    多谢白凡兄,你总是说到点子说得精辟。

    我也感觉这样下去,民主只能叫做"民主之春",因为秋天一到,民主就不是民主了,它叫"秋后算账"。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 白凡
    有点意思。Google这么快就自打耳光了。比起中国政府利用Google所说的骇客偷盗,美国政府就勇敢得多了。这就是占领了道德高地的好处。其实与Google自己的“不作恶”的信条相对而言,政府没有不作恶的,大公司包括Google也一样。百姓对太大的东西都得留个心眼。想起前一阵儿运动乐一边大骂中国不民主,一边高举美国警察监控言论的大棒威胁万维网民的故事,感到特别讽刺。
    屏蔽 举报回复