zt Google 全部“照办” 谷歌"被迫"向美国政府提交用户数据
谷歌"被迫"向美国政府提交用户数据 时间:2011-11-07 07:04:55 来源: 综合报道 点击:158次 [ 大 中 小 ] 《华尔街日报》近日报道,美国政府曾凭借秘密的法院指令,要求谷歌公司和另一个较小的互联网服务提供商索尼克(Sonic)公司提交维基解密 网站志愿者雅各布·阿佩尔鲍姆的电子邮件(Gmail)账户信息。 《华尔街日报》称,美国政府要求谷歌和索尼克上交的信息包括阿佩尔鲍姆登 录他Gmail账户的IP地址以及在过去两年中与阿佩尔鲍姆通信的人的电子邮件地址等。索尼克公司曾提起上诉,但官司失败,他们只好向政府提交了有关信 息。谷歌则拒绝发表评论。 现年28岁的阿佩尔鲍姆因被指与维基解密网站关系密切已经成为美国警方监控目标,并频频在机场准备出入境时遭到美 国海关以及安全人员拘留和审问。美国《赫芬顿邮报》称,阿佩尔鲍姆去年8月曾在新泽西州纽瓦克机场被扣3小时,他随身带的笔记本电脑遭搜查,3部手机被收 缴。 据报道,2009年,谷歌开始公开他们从政府部门收到的要求公开用户信息的情况。在当年12月31日之前的6个月中,谷歌共收到了 4601次请求,并且几乎全部“照办”。
zt 变天了!Google最终向美国政 府交出了维基解密志愿者的Gmail数据 | |||||||||||||||
送交者: zippers 2011年10月19日00:20:22 | |||||||||||||||
Google Hands Wikileaks Volunteer's Gmail Data to U.S. GovernmentBy John Paul Titlow / October 10, 2011 4:45 PM / 44 Comments inShare567
The contacts list and IP address data of Jacob Appelbaum, a WikiLeaks volunteer and developer for Tor was given to the U.S. government after they requested it using a secret court order enabled by a controversial 1986 law called the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, according to the Wall Street Journal. The law allows the government to demand information from ISPs not only without a warrant, but without ever notifying the user. A word from our sponsor: ![]() Ad powered by BTBuckets Sonic.net, a smaller ISP who was also asked to hand over data related Appelbaum, tried to challenge the order in court, but ultimately lost and was to give up the information. It's not known if Google resisted the request, but both companies did try to ensure that Appelbaum could at least be made aware of the data retrieval. According to the company's own Transparency Report, Google received 4,601 user data requests from the U.S. government in the second half of 2010, and it complied with 94% of them. Those requests include warrantless inquiries as well as those accompanied by a search warrant. Some Troubling ImplicationsThe idea of an ISP handing over user data to governments without the aid of a search warrant has some troubling implications for privacy advocates and civil liberties proponents. In the WikiLeaks case, the line between advocates and participants in the transfer of data can sometimes be blurry. If in its ongoing investigation into WikiLeaks the U.S. Department of Justice is free to ask Google, Twitter or Facebook for private data without users' knowledge, who's to say they can't access private information about people who have merely expressed sympathy for the organization? Tech companies haven't necessarily rolled over and played dead on the issue. When the DoJ made a similar WikiLeaks-related request of Twitter in December, the company succeeded in having the order unsealed, meaning it was able to notify users about the request. Google is among a number of tech companies that are asking Congress to rethink the law in light of the unexpected ways in which the Web has evolved in the last several years.
| |||||||||||||||
![]() | ||
|