中国社交媒体上性暴力公众情绪分析的语境化研究
中国社交媒体上性暴力公众情绪分析的语境化研究：一项混合方法研究
Contextualizing Public Sentiment Analysis of Sexual Violence on Chinese Social Media: A Mixed-Method Study
——《性研究与社会政策》2026年4月23日网上发表——
【摘要】背景：性暴力依然是全球公共卫生领域的一项严峻负担；然而，受限于家庭隐私的文化规范及社会污名，在中国语境下，性暴力受害者的披露率尤为低下。社交媒体提供了一种“半匿名”的渠道，使幸存者及公众得以抒发那些在临床诊疗或问卷调查中鲜被捕捉的情感。本研究旨在通过分析大规模的社交媒体文本，刻画中国公众对性暴力事件的情感反应特征，并阐释这些情感模式背后的社会心理机制。方法：本研究采用混合研究法设计，对从微博、知乎和小红书三大平台采集的N=58,214 条用户原创帖文进行了分析。在定量分析阶段，研究人员运用“大连理工大学中文情感词汇本体”计算了情感强度得分、情感极性，并构建了情感共现矩阵。随后，两名独立编码员在达成高度一致性（Kappa系数=0.87）的基础上，归纳并识别出能够解释上述统计模式的核心主题。结果：在数字空间的公众话语中，负面情绪占据了主导地位（占比82.5%），整体情感极性为-0.68。其中，“厌恶”是强度最高（平均值M=6.8）且出现频率最高（占比42.5%）的情感；实证分析显示，这种厌恶感与“身体被玷污感”以及对性暴力行为产生的生理性排斥紧密相关。“愤怒”（占比22.5%）则主要表现为一种“道德义愤”，其矛头主要指向施暴者及制度性的不公义。尽管“恐惧”与“悲伤”这两种情感单独出现时的强度处于中等水平，但在幸存者的叙事文本中，二者的共现率分别高达62%和45%，这深刻反映了创伤经历所带来的无助感。结论：公众关于性暴力的社会话语主要由高强度的“厌恶”与“愤怒”所主导，这标志着公众对性暴力行为抱持着强烈的生理性排斥与道德义愤。尤为关键的是，在涉及医疗救助的讨论中，“恐惧”情绪的普遍存在揭示出“就医羞耻感”已成为受害者寻求医疗援助的一大障碍。上述研究发现凸显了当前亟需建立强制性的“创伤知情关怀”规范，并全面开展关于“知情同意”的教育普及工作，以此最大限度地避免对受害者造成二次创伤，并明确社会交往中的边界意识。
【关键词】态度，性，社交媒体，公共卫生
[Abstract] Background: Sexual violence remains a severe global public health burden, yet disclosure rates are particularly low in Chinese contexts due to cultural norms of family privacy and stigma. Social media provides a semi-anonymous channel through which survivors and the public express emotions that are rarely captured in clinical or survey research. This study aimed to characterize public emotional responses to sexual violence in China by analyzing large-scale social media discourse and to interpret the psychosocial mechanisms underlying these emotional patterns. Methods: A Mixed-Method Design was utilized to analyze N?=?58,214 original user-generated posts collected from Weibo, Zhihu, and Xiaohongshu. The quantitative phase employed the DLUT Chinese Sentiment Lexicon to compute Emotion Intensity Scores, calculate polarity, and generate emotion co-occurrence matrices. Two independent coders achieved high inter-coder agreement (kappa?=?0.87) to identify core themes explaining the statistical patterns. Results: Negative emotions dominated the digital discourse (82.5%), with an overall polarity of -0.68. Disgust was the most intense (M?=?6.8) and frequent (42.5%) emotion, empirically linked to “Bodily Contamination” and physiological rejection of the act. Anger (22.5%) manifested as “Moral Outrage,” primarily targeting perpetrators and systemic injustice. While Fear and Sadness were moderate individually, they co-occurred in 62% and 45% of survivor narratives, respectively, reflecting trauma-related helplessness. Conclusion: Public discourse on sexual violence is dominated by high-intensity Disgust and Anger, signaling profound physiological rejection and moral outrage. Critically, the prevalence of Fear in medical discussions identifies “Medical Shame” as a major barrier to care. These findings underscore the urgent need for mandatory Trauma-Informed Care protocols and comprehensive consent education to reduce retraumatization and clarify social boundaries.
[Key words] Attitude, Sex, Social Media, Public Health
论文原文：Chuchu Ni, Shijia Xu, Yikang Mo, et al. (2026). Contextualizing Public Sentiment Analysis of Sexual Violence on Chinese Social Media: A Mixed-Method Study. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, Published: 23 April 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-026-01335-4
（翻译兼责任编辑：MARY）
（需要英文原文的朋友，请联系微信：millerdeng95或iacmsp）
