To Herbert Grubel The ways rescue ruined Canada
To Herbert Grubel The ways rescue ruined Canada
Frank Li May 6, 2026
Note: Herbert Gunter Grubel (Feb 26, 1934 -) is a Canadian professor, economist, writer, and former politician. He is Professor Emeritus of Economics at Simon Fraser University and a Senior Fellow at the Fraser Institute.
May 2 2026, I sent Prof. below email moved by the video that he accepted interview and showed hie worry for ruined Canada I cry for you, Canada: 92-year-old prof and ex-MP’s warning about immigration & welfare state.
As earlier as in Oct 1, 2015, Prof. Herbert Grubel published article titled Canada should not open its doors to the world, to have indicated bad consequence: An influx of new immigrants could bankrupt our welfare state.
Today; the sad worries of professor has become true. I copy the article in the end of this topic.
Hongde Li 2026年5月2日 17:03
收件人：herbert.grubel@shaw.ca, Mark.carney@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, goldy.hyder@thebusinesscouncil.ca, vieprivee@quebecor.com, social.media@bombardier.com, eric.martel@aero.bombardier.com, bdemosky@gmail.com, bart.demosky@earth-front.com, stephen.mccullough@bombardier.com, David.Murray@aero.bombardier.com, Hongde Li
The ways rescue democracy ruined Canada
PM Mark Carney and Goldy Hyder are rare rational, I hope Prof. Herbert G. Grubel may help them rescue democracy ruined Canada
To Prof. Herbert G. Grubel
Professor of Economics, Simon Fraser Universuty
Dear Herbert Gunter Grubel
This is Frank Li from the city of Waterloo, a Metallographist from P.R. China.
This email inspired by interview I cry for you, Canada: 92-year-old prof and ex-MP’s warning about immigration & welfare state.
Preaching is useless, please take action and make phone calls by your influence in the political and alchemical circle of Canada .
I attach an article Humanize the West dehumanized world, please call PM Mark Carney, Goldy Hyder, CEO, Business Council of Canada.
They are rational and have the quality and ability to rescue Canada by promoting acceptable approaches in Canada where people have freedom dehumanized mindlessly to fight against everything.
1...Humanize Democracy
Learn to Technocratic Democracy of China to promote form a civil legislature by you and Goldy Hyder by organizing entreprenurs, scientists, engineerd, and social elites from whole Canada in self reliance part time work as lawmakers. Takes 30% vote rights to parallel run with the Govb-one, thereby humanize the beast antihuman democracy.
2...Humanize Healthcare
Promote the use of vinegar + melatonin to uproot the dilemma in Universal Healthcare of Canada
Vinegar can destruct covalent bonded viruses to uproot infectious disease; and makes physiological indicators normal. Melatonin regenerating cells of nerve, immune, kidney failure restore systems.
My experience; water diluting 5% vinegar x 18ml (0.9g pure)/50 kg or 2x500mg vinegar capsules/50kg is able to cure or prevent any cause of fever and coughs of flu; and add melatonin 10 mg is able to cure diabetes, Alzheimer's etc. to uproot the inhuman mind of incurable diseases from western medicine.
I took vinegar + melatonin daily once; in days; my vision shockingly improved and I have to dump 200 degree reading glass; because the glass makes my vision blurry, in weeks; my facial skin rosy and smooth, lesser wrinkles, and the digestion, energy, hearing, memory, and mental agility, etc., all improved; show the younger in blood, vessels, microcirculation, and more; systemic rejuvenation in 30 years younger.
Vinegar + melatonin will be able to empty emergency rooms and hospitals. By diet supplements self help cure diseases to reduce reliance on public healthcare is the only way to stop the killing of Western medicine.
Please try the suggested dose; you will be shocked by amazing systemic rejuvenation in 30 years younger. Then suggests to friends and Professors.
<<<<<<<<<<>>>>>>>>>>>>
Dr. Mark Carney is the designer of the 21st century.
Since Columbus's voyage to discover the New World, European powers colluded to form an Evil Axis, plundering and killing people all over the world. During World War II, the US took over continued to plunder and bomb the world.
For a long time, politicians around the world yielded to evil manners; but Dr. Mark Carney sounded the alarm for the end of the world by American hegemony that bombs the world by plundering the world, and sparked global action.
See April 26, 2026 video Mark Carney’s 9-Minute Walkout Just Changed Global Power Forever. He rejected the coercion from U.S. politicians.
Please Google Dr. Mark Carney in education & profession background, especially since taking office of Gov-Canada, he has made speeches and policies; we may conclude that in the current world he is a rare sober politician.
I believe that Dr. Mark Carney is the leader for the new world in action; his thoughts and brave actions ushered in and re-defined the humanized development of the 21st century and made human beings live a life as human should.
In comparison, many politicians are in the quality of street girls or boys and eagerly playing democracy for enjoying lavish salaries and benefits, and political privileges, but without basic qualities that are needed to govern a country.
Below is a section of my new writing, to help understand the fact why Canada was dehumanized unlivable.
Recently I happily read a post of Dr. Jostein Hauge: “China has done so much more for global prosperity than the West, I'm shocked at how blatantly accepted it's become to hold anti-China views in the West.”
The answer is simple, the West has never humanized; people view inhuman as humane.
Here are the distinction of the civilization of China is human, the West is beast inhumane.
To govern the remote areas where riots broke out; the royal power had to send family members to remote areas with lands as vassal states independent economy war machines; 771BC China fell into 550 years of wars. The disasters of wars enlightened that ideology used for rumor making wars and brainwashing people as War maniacs. So that in 134BC, China had to outlaw schools of thought.
China has been taking lessons to avoid repeating the mistakes, but in the West; Hegel indicated: “What experience and history teach is this, that peoples and governments have never learned anything from history, and have never acted on the lessons that should have been learned from it”.
The antihuman west made God-religions brainwash people as sworn enemies to have torn apart humanity and culture and to have hatred fragmented the world in economy and society.
The belief of China is Confucian self-collective discipline; do not do others what you would not have them do to you. But the belief of the West is fabricated God to kill for the sake of God.
This was the reason that Zheng He Fleet (1405-1433) 7 times around the world, besides fair trade, did not make colonial rule; and presented large numbers of books to the Italian pope to trigger the West out of the Dark Ages. But 59 years later Columbus discovered the New World, The West swarming out to kill, loot, and colonize the world. Today, Britain still preserved over 20,000 cultural relics of China.
In the West; until this moment, it has never control the ideology; so that the antihuman culture cultured antihuman people by their antihuman brains endlessly fabricate antihuman ideologies; by which endlessly plants the antihuman cultural landmines and evil bombing human world.
The most beast antihuman cultural landmines are democracy and human rights; democracy makes beasts in power; while human rights protect criminal crimes. Now let alone wars, in democracies; people lost basic sense of security in home. In Canada, police advises people leave car key outside to avoid robbery hurting people; if you fight with robbery, will be jailed due to violent human rights.
The human rights protect union culture regarding strike for more by doing less in unearned gains as in line with human rights; otherwise it is slave labor in violating human rights; and corrupted quality of labor, the left of WWII hard life cultured quality generation, the labor productivity brought away forever. The democracies in West; have been human rights uprooted foundation for manufacturing.
The West made everything in the perfect antihuman ensure killing human life. The antihuman West cultures antihuman beasts promote the antihuman stuff by Color Revolution & war.
Internationally; look at the bloody war killing, it is the antihuman politicians driving State Apparatus to force people kill or be killed.
Domestically; Britain & son Canada are ongoing a population shift that high quality elites flee and replaced by low quality people.
The countries have plagued in the mess and poverty in semi-cave proved the low quality of its people, who cannot be trained to be law-abiding citizens or qualified constructors, but skilled destructors. Britain is filling in such waste trash.
The government spends huge sums of money to feed and attract illegal immigrants by providing them with hotels; while own citizens poor sleep on the streets; crimes are rampant and led to its citizens lost dignity as a human should be.
Such manmade antihuman disasters rooted into the tomb of the ancestors of Briton.
Briton’s proud of ancestors made proud of representative democracy has been destructing the world and uprooting the base for the survival of their own descendants and the life of world people by making beasts and psychos in power.
Dr. Jostein Hauge should re-examine the performance of own intelligence; If merely keens on preaching; no action to stop disaster.
Look at Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Diplomat Kishore Mahbubani, etc., for years they exhausted preaching; but the democracy makes beasts in power ruining world into extinction; due to they didn’t take action to fix the democracy beast play.
People around the world are desperately seeking a way to survive; they all understand and thank the sincerity of Professor Jeffrey Sachs, Diplomat Kishore Mahbubani; etc.; but their preaching cannot rescue humans from ruined.
Here are my explored feasible approaches for Dr. Jostein Hauge solving the real problems in Britain.
Sincerely
Frank Li, May 2, 2026
Shared to
Mark.carney@parl.gc.ca, pm@pm.gc.ca, Media@pmo-cpm.gc.ca
Goldy Hyder, CEO, Business Council of Canada:
goldy.hyder@thebusinesscouncil.ca
Pierre Karl Péladeau, President, Quebecor Inc: vieprivee@quebecor.com
Herbert Grubel : herbert.grubel@shaw.ca
Bombardier
éric Martel, President and CEO:
social.media@bombardier.com, eric.martel@aero.bombardier.com
Bart Demosky, Vice President CEO:
bdemosky@gmail.com, bart.demosky@earth-front.com
Stephen Mccullough, Executive Engineering:
stephen.mccullough@bombardier.com
David Murray, Executive Manufacturing, IT:
David.Murray@aero.bombardier.com
Gmail - Humanize the West dehumanized world 291K
Canada should not open its doors to the world
Herbert Grubel Oct 1, 2015
https://nationalpost.com/opinion/herbert-grubel-canada-should-not-open-its-doors-to-the-world
An influx of new immigrants could bankrupt our welfare state
The refugee crisis in Europe has prompted many Canadians to demand that the government admit large numbers of refugees for permanent resettlement. Most of these demands are motivated by humanitarian sentiments but they are also supported by libertarians who argue for unlimited immigration on the grounds that it would benefit all Canadians, just like it has in the past, creating a country of social harmony, high incomes and a quality of life that is one of the best in the world.
The Post's Terence Corcoran recently made this argument (‘Open our doors to the world,’ Sept. 11). However, the libertarian analysis is no longer valid in today’s world. First, there is no more fertile empty land on the prairies that requires immigrants to cultivate. In fact, technology used by farmers now is so efficient and labour-saving that people are leaving the land to settle in towns and cities.
Second, the cost and risk of travel are so much lower, while the pool of potential immigrants and the economic gains they can expect are so much larger than ever before in Canada’s history, meaning that an open border would result in a tsunami of immigrants.
Third, immigrants would no longer come from Europe, where populations are declining, but from Asia, Africa and Latin America. The cultures and values of these regions are much different, especially with regard to religious tolerance and the treatment of women and people with different sexual orientations.
In spite of the official policy of multiculturalism, these backgrounds are likely to delay integration into Canadian society and if the migrants are numerous enough, may well end up creating ethnic enclaves in which the occupants’ culture and religions are maintained. Such enclaves can lead to economic, social and political frictions. France, the Netherlands, Austria, Sweden and other Western democracies have such problems, which have led to the electoral success of anti-immigrant parties and further social tensions.
Fourth, many immigrants will be Muslims. Most of them are peaceful and tolerant, but an unknown, potentially large number will be militant jihadists and present a serious threat to Canadian security. Surveillance of this minority will be very costly and cannot prevent all risks. No such problems and costs have ever accompanied immigration before.
Fifth, the most important difference between modern Canada and when previous waves of immigrants entered this country is the existence of the welfare state. In the absence of its universal social benefits in the past, only healthy immigrants with strong work ethics, drive and skills came to Canada. Under present conditions, potentially many immigrants would not possess these qualities and impose heavy fiscal burdens on our welfare programs and ultimately bankrupt them. It is for this reason that Milton Friedman, one of the world’s most ardent advocates for human and economic freedom concluded that, “The welfare state and free immigration are incompatible.”
The problem identified by Friedman has been quantified in a study by myself and Patrick Grady, in which we found that the average incomes and tax payments of recent immigrants (documented by Statistics Canada) are much lower than those of the average Canadian and that the immigrants consume roughly the same amount of government services as the average Canadian. The difference between the taxes paid and services consumed by the average recent immigrant equals about $6,000 annually. Given the total number of these immigrants, the annual fiscal burden on Canadian taxpayers comes to about $30 billion.
Sixth, immigrants in large numbers cause a substantial redistribution of income, decreasing the incomes of workers and increasing the income of employers. Drawing on the basic results of a study of the redistribution effect in the United States by Harvard University Professor of Economics George Borjas, in Canada the decrease of the annual income of labour is $40 billion and the gain of employers is $43.5 billion, resulting in a net gain of $3.5 billion for the latter. This gain is called the immigration effect and is due to increased opportunities to trade.
Advocates for free immigration make much of this gain but the data show that it is very small relative to the redistribution of income. These advocates also laud the increase in Canada’s aggregate national income resulting from the immigrants’ economic activities. However, all of this increase accrues to the immigrants in the form of wages, lowers per capita incomes and is accompanied by greater congestion and pollution in metropolitan areas. Increased demand for and cost of housing reduces the ability of young Canadians to own homes and start families, creating frictions between generations.
The economic and social costs just discussed do not make the case against all immigration but make the case for the selection of immigrants with prospects for economic success that are high enough to eliminate the fiscal burden and the admission of immigrants in numbers small enough to prevent the risk of creating the substantial redistribution of income, the establishment of ethnic enclaves, the threat of jihadist terror and the problems associated with substantial and rapid population increases.
In the context of the current debate over policies for the admission of refugees from the Middle East, it is important for all Canadians that these considerations are given proper weight in the selection of immigrants and decisions about their numbers.