中国现代哲学家学会

注册日期:2015-01-10
访问总量:1495798次

menu网络日志正文menu

Why WuXing Is Not Trainable — An Instancological V


发表时间:+-

Why WuXing Is Not Trainable

— An Instancological View


Many readers ask a natural question once they encounter WuXing (悟性) in Instancology:

If WuXing is a higher cognition, why can’t it be trained like logic, skills, or techniques?

The short answer is simple:

Because WuXing is not a capability.

It is an occurrence of an instance.

To see why this matters, we must first clarify what “training” really means.

What Training Actually Is

Training always presupposes three conditions:

a pre-existing function

repeatable operations

incremental improvement through accumulation

Training works only where:

parts can be assembled

methods can be rehearsed

outcomes scale with repetition

This is why training works for:

logic

mathematics

memory

language skills

technical expertise

All of these belong to the Relative domain (RR or AR). They are functions operating inside an already-given structure.

Training does not create structure.

Training only optimizes function within structure.

This distinction is decisive.

What WuXing Is (and Is Not)

WuXing is not:

a skill

a method

a technique

a higher-level reasoning

a refined intuition built from experience

WuXing is:

the immediate grasp of a whole

the sudden appearance of meaning

the recognition of structure without derivation

the emergence of an instance as a whole

In Instancological terms:

WuXing is not a process.

WuXing is an instantiation event.

You do not arrive at WuXing step by step.

WuXing arrives when the instance appears.

Whole Before Parts: The Core Reason WuXing Is Not Trainable

Instancology’s most fundamental principle is this:

The whole precedes the parts.

Training works only where:

parts → accumulation → whole

WuXing works in the opposite direction:

whole → parts become obvious

This reversal makes training impossible.

You cannot train your way into seeing a whole that has not yet appeared.

No amount of assembling parts will force a whole into existence.

That is why:

logical rigor cannot guarantee insight

repetition cannot produce understanding

intelligence cannot manufacture realization

WuXing is not the reward of effort.

It is the event of structural appearance.

Why “Practicing WuXing” Is a Category Error

Many spiritual, philosophical, and psychological traditions claim that:

“with enough practice, enlightenment will come.”

Instancology identifies this as a category mistake.

Practice belongs to RR (Relative Relative):

habit

conditioning

repetition

optimization

WuXing belongs to the Absolute-related domain:

structure

necessity

wholeness

non-derivability

You can practice silence.

You can practice attention.

You can practice discipline.

But none of these practices produce WuXing.

At best, they remove obstacles.

They do not cause the event.

Conditions Are Not Causes

This point is subtle but crucial.

People often confuse:

creating conditions

with

producing outcomes

You may create conditions in which WuXing is more likely to occur:

honesty in thinking

refusal of self-deception

abandonment of premature explanations

endurance of uncertainty

But conditions are not causes.

WuXing does not happen because you practiced well.

It happens when the structure becomes unavoidable.

This is why WuXing cannot be scheduled, replicated, or guaranteed.

Why WuXing Feels Sudden and Unteachable

WuXing always feels sudden because:

it does not grow

it does not evolve

it does not accumulate

It appears fully formed or not at all.

That is also why WuXing cannot be transmitted by instruction.

You can explain logic.

You can teach mathematics.

You can demonstrate methods.

But WuXing cannot be handed over.

At most, one can point.

And pointing is not training.

Absolute WuXing vs Relative WuXing

Instancology distinguishes:

Relative WuXing (RW):

insight within a domain

pattern recognition

local wholeness

Absolute WuXing (AW):

grasp of structural necessity

recognition of ontological limits

direct encounter with the boundary of explanation

Neither is trainable in the strict sense.

RW may appear more frequently with experience, but it is still not produced by experience.

AW is entirely non-trainable, because it concerns what no method can reach.

Why This Is Not Pessimistic

Saying WuXing is not trainable is not discouraging.

It is liberating.

It frees WuXing from:

elitism

mystification

technique worship

false promises

WuXing does not belong to experts.

It does not belong to traditions.

It does not belong to authority.

It belongs to structure itself.

When the instance appears, WuXing appears.

When it does not, no effort can substitute.

Final Statement

WuXing is not trainable because:

training operates on functions

WuXing is the appearance of structure

structure precedes all function

the whole cannot be assembled from parts

WuXing is not achieved.

It is encountered.

And this is precisely why it is real.

浏览(118)
thumb_up(0)
评论(0)
  • 当前共有0条评论