三重垄断与操纵：全能国家的前提与困境

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State

钱 宏Archer Hong Qian

2025.11.8晨于Singapore途中

如果美国的马姆达尼-桑德斯们理解和鼓吹的社会主义（包括强制共产主义、国家社会主义、特色社会主义或穆斯林社会主义、乃至民主社会主义），也是全能政府-举国体制，那么：

全能政府的前提条件，是实行“三垄断-三操纵”：

首先，垄断-操纵真理的意识形态制度——即以话术-谎言替代逻辑思行自由，阻断生命自组织连接动態平衡的交互主体共生

其次，垄断-操纵权力的政治法律制度——即以黨团社群取代警察、司法、立法

最后，垄断-操纵资源与经济利益的经济制度——即以劫富济贫-政府供应取代劳动分工-市场秩序

然而，三垄断-操纵必然扼杀国民、社会、政府三大自组织交互作用生机，致使全能政府-举国体制，陷入顾此失彼的混乱失序，结果必然是“成也垄断-操纵，败也垄断-操纵”——成的是，结黨营私的官僚机会主义者，殖官主义盛行；败的是，诚实工作的社会建设主义者，让全能政府无以为继！

当然，除非有“制度外部性”供应、供养这个全能政府-举国体制，比如体制外给予“最惠国待遇”（GSP非对等交互普惠制）条件下的“世界贸易组织”（WTO）——“特利芬-罗德里克三元难题”条件下的经济全球化（始于二战后至21世纪初的全球化2.0，Archer），可以续其命，甚至辉煌一时。

但是，即便如此，也不是长久之计，再富有的“最惠国待遇”输出者，在“特利芬-罗德里克三元难题”条件下，都不可能长期失血，危及自身（国民待遇）机体健康。

这些主权在民的国家（如美国、欧盟、英国、加拿大、土耳其、乌克兰、列支敦士登），他们终究会反思质疑“凭什么呀？”并诉诸“武力”强行或理性纠偏（如取消GSP，加征关税，甚至“脱钩断链”）。这样一来，“横空出世”的川普、山普、江普、海普们，必会打碎经济全球化2.0，或“富裕导向民主”话术包装下掩盖的不公平、不对等幻象——“全球自由贸易”的神话！

否则，他们自己也难以为继，受惠者也未必感谢反而会自我膨胀，而断了制度外部性供养的“全能举国体制”自然而然会陷入“内卷”和得而复失（续而复死）的“温家宝难题”（2012）终局！

所以，虽然美国的马姆达尼-桑德斯们的言行，一看就是个失败的社会主义打小抄的笑话，但他们居然能通过“竞选”获得美国最大城市纽约（人口830多万、都会区的GDP超过2万亿美元）的执政机会，那就只能承认事实，让美国人民也尝试一下“全能政府三重垄断-操纵”的厉害，也让美国立国250年以来的“犯错-纠错”机制，再经受一次关乎“We the People”切身利益的严峻考验吧！

参看：

1、《一切就此开始：高超的政治话术，透露狡黠的愚蠢》 http://symbiosism.com.cn/11116.html

2、《曼达尼是“民主社会主义”者？搞笑了吧？》
http://symbiosism.com.cn/11108.html
https://blog.creaders.net/user_blog_diary.php?did=NTMwNzEz

3、Archer Hong Qian：最简明的全球化三段论 http://symbiosism.com.cn/9985.html

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State（三种垄断与操纵：全能国家的前提与困境）

By Archer Hong Qian

On the way to Singapore, November 8, 2025, in the morning.

The Three Monopolies and Manipulations: The Premise and Predicament of an Omnipotent State
Archer Hong Qian
Morning of November 8, 2025 · En route to Singapore

If the socialism understood and promoted by America’s Mamdani–Sanders faction (including coercive communism, national socialism, socialism with national characteristics or Muslim socialism, and even democratic socialism) is also a totalitarian government–whole-nation system, then:

The precondition for a totalitarian government is the implementation of the “Three Monopolies – Three Manipulations”:

First, the monopoly and manipulation of truth through an ideological system—namely, replacing the freedom of logical thinking and acting with rhetoric and lies, thereby blocking the intersubjective symbiosis in which life self-organizes to connect dynamic balance.

Second, the monopoly and manipulation of power through a political–legal system—namely, replacing the police, judiciary, and legislature with party, factional, and collective organizations.

Finally, the monopoly and manipulation of resources and economic interests through an economic system—namely, replacing the division of labor and market order with redistribution and government provisioning under the slogan of “robbing the rich to help the poor.”

However, the three monopolies and manipulations will inevitably stifle the vitality of the three great self-organizing interactions among the people, society, and the state, causing the totalitarian government–whole-nation system to fall into unmanageable disorder and confusion. The result is bound to be: “Success by monopoly–manipulation, failure by monopoly–manipulation.” What succeeds is the bureaucratic opportunists who form cliques for private gain—colonial officialism flourishes; what fails is the honest social constructionists, leaving the totalitarian state unable to sustain itself.

Of course, unless there is “institutional externality” that supplies and sustains this totalitarian government–whole-nation system. For example, the “Most-Favored-Nation” (MFN, a Generalized System of Preferences of unequal reciprocity) granted by external systems under the “World Trade Organization” (WTO)—the economic globalization conditioned by the “Triffin–Rodrik Trilemma” (beginning after WWII and lasting into the early 21st century, known as Globalization 2.0)—can extend its life, even allowing it to flourish for a time.

Yet even so, it is not a long-term solution. No matter how wealthy the provider of “Most-Favored-Nation” treatment may be, under the “Triffin–Rodrik Trilemma,” it cannot continue losing blood indefinitely without endangering its own national (citizen welfare) organism.

These countries where sovereignty rests with the people (such as the United States, the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, Turkey, Ukraine, Liechtenstein)—they will eventually reflect and ask, “Why should we?” and resort to forceful or rational correction (such as canceling GSP, raising tariffs, or even “decoupling and severing supply chains”). As a result, the sudden rise of figures like Trump, Milei, and other “Pop”-type leaders will inevitably shatter the illusions of Globalization 2.0, or the myth of “global free trade” concealed under the rhetoric of “prosperity-driven democracy”—a system built on unfair and unequal terms.

Otherwise, the provider countries themselves will be unable to sustain it, and the beneficiaries may not even be grateful—instead becoming self-inflated. Once cut off from institutional externalities, the totalitarian whole-nation system will naturally fall into “involution” and the cycle of “gain and loss again” (prolongation followed by collapse), resulting in what is known as the “Wen Jiabao Dilemma” (2012) endgame.

Therefore, although the words and actions of America’s Mamdani–Sanders faction may seem like a laughable copy-and-paste of failed socialism, the fact that they have managed to gain governing power through “elections” in the largest U.S. city, New York (with more than 8.3 million residents and a metropolitan GDP exceeding $2 trillion), means we must accept reality: let the American people also experience the severity of the “Three Monopolies – Three Manipulations” of a totalitarian government. And let the United States’ 250-year-old mechanism of “making mistakes and correcting mistakes” once again undergo a severe test—one that touches the vital interests of “We the People.”