One Key Difference Between Eastern and Western

One Key Difference Between Eastern and Western Social Consciousness: 

The Social Stage and Its Stars

In terms of social consciousness, there is a profound difference between East and West. One of the most striking contrasts lies in the idea of the social stage and the stars who perform upon it.

In Western societies such as the United States, government officials serve mainly as the builders and managers of the great social stage. Their job is to provide order and ensure a fair set of rules. The real “stars” of society are those who distinguish themselves through personal achievement — entrepreneurs, inventors, artists, writers, athletes, and performers. They embody the creativity and vitality of the society itself.

In contrast, in many Eastern societies, government officials are not only the managers of the social stage but also the leading performers upon it. National, provincial, and local leaders often stand at the center of social honor. For others, recognition and success largely depend on the approval or favor of those in power. What appears on the surface as merely a difference in social “celebrities” in fact reflects a fundamental distinction in incentive systems and power structures.

Western modern societies rest upon a well-developed rule of law. Political transitions bring limited policy adjustments, not upheavals of the basic social order. This allows every individual — regardless of birth — a fair chance to perform, to innovate, and to realize personal value. Entrepreneurs such as Elon Musk, Steve Jobs, and Bill Gates, all of ordinary origin, became global leaders of innovation through their own talent and determination.

By contrast, in many Eastern societies, social and economic resources are concentrated in the hands of the state. Only those who gain the favor of political leaders are given access to opportunities and resources. Yet this system carries inherent risk: the fate of an entrepreneur often depends on the fate of a political patron. Once the latter changes or falls from power, the former may face great uncertainty. In the West, however, enterprises are protected by legal institutions, not by personal ties — many American companies have survived and thrived through multiple presidential administrations.

This difference is also reflected in the career choices of immigrant families.

First-generation immigrants from the East, shaped by their native culture, often prefer the stability of government work. Their children, raised in the West, are drawn to multinational corporations or entrepreneurship. They find bureaucratic environments dull and instead pursue workplaces filled with creativity and innovation.

In Eastern societies, civil servants enjoy higher pay, status, and privilege; rising to a bureau chief or department director often means becoming “a person above others.” In the West, government jobs are standardized and moderately paid, offering little room for personal expression. The relationship between government and enterprise is one of service, not hierarchy. The true stars of modern Western society are innovators and creators — those who generate new value—rather than mayors, governors, or bureaucrats drawing high salaries.

The same contrast extends to the realm of culture and art. Art grows from the soil of social consciousness; an enlightened society inevitably nurtures advanced science, art, and philosophy. The dominance of Western societies in Nobel Prizes reflects this intellectual climate.

Consider Hong Kong: before the 1990s, with its open and liberal atmosphere, it shone as the “Pearl of the Orient,” its film and music culture influencing all of East Asia. But after the National Security Law came into effect, that creative vitality faded rapidly.

In essence, the managers and performers of a society’s stage must each play their own role.

The task of the manager is to build and maintain the stage — not to stand at its center. Only when institutions guarantee space for individual creativity and freedom can a society truly flourish and sustain its cultural brilliance.

Peter Lee in Toronto