自然

注册日期:2011-12-24
访问总量:798222次

menu网络日志正文menu

今天我最讨厌美国的什么?


发表时间:+-

记得, 八十年代我初到美国的时候,对美国人的善良,公司的服务友好,商店的相互信任,深深感动,可是曾几何时,这些都成记忆了。 现在的商店里,东西都加上橱窗,防止黑命贵的另采购,和墨西哥人的随手拿, 商店的门口都加上了警卫,防止偷摸。 同时银行也不断来信提醒防止诈骗,这可能是拜托大量亚系人涌入的后果。 


但是这一切虽然讨厌,只要自己注意,对个人生活的影响还不是很大,有一件事却使我恨的咬牙切齿,但是没有办法,只能忍受, 这就是打电话, 我不能不打电话,例如MAKE  APPOINTMEN T, 等等,可是每次打电话,我都气坏了。 想当年的美国是多么好啊,不论给谁打电话,立即就有人非常友好的帮助你,态度好的令你感动,去看医生,RE FERRA L。都是护士帮你做,做好了,打电话告诉你,现在要你自己去要REFERRAL 的地址,自己去约会。 这也就算了。了不起麻烦一点, 最令人生畏的是打电话。


你拿起电话,接通了,不得不与人工智能对话,他问你名字,地址,生日,MEMBER。号码, 然后问你为什么打电话,然后他对你的问题给出一个大家都知道的回答,就要挂电话,你不让他挂,要与人谈话,他🌽不得不转人工服务, 一转人工服务, 音乐响起,让你等,好一点的会告诉你等多久,不好的就这么无尽头的等下去,如果中断,算你倒霉,重新打。 


等到一个人与你讲话了,问你为什么打电话,于是他再转到你要的部门,音乐再次响起。 有时等了半小时了,还不知还要等多长时间。

你好不容易再等到一个人与你讲话,但是英语不是美国音,印度音,墨西哥音等等,非常难懂,有一次我问他在哪里接电话,他说菲律宾, 因为菲律宾人工便宜,所以公司让菲律宾人回电话。

我无奈,只能连猜带蒙的与他对话。 如果还是不懂,只好重打。 


现在美国除了 FIDELITY。的电话还保持用美国人回电话,不用人工智能回话外,其他差不多都是先用人工智能,不行的话再用外国人接电话了。  我对于人工智能回话非常反感,它不能解决问题,只是告诉你常识,而打电话的人,往往有具体问题要他们解决,听着它啰啰嗦嗦的回答,真恨不得拿电话咂过去。 


我不知道,现在中国,欧洲是不是也是这样,如果只是美国这样,美国真的完了。想想当年美国大手大脚,现在竟然小气到要删与顾客对话的钱了,不让顾客打电话,真是笨到奶奶家了。


上帝保佑美国,阿门!

浏览(511)
thumb_up(3)
评论(9)
  • 当前共有9条评论
  • guoqu 回复 巴黎老高

    你有病? 美国的问题扯到中国去。这不是美国制度问题, 也不是哪个美国总统的错。 这是人类本性自私懒惰愚蠢造成的问题。


    美国的这个问题要等一代人,下一代人才会重新恢复。 美国地大物博,倒不了知识但是目前没得救。只能熬过去。

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 自然

    这是人工智能CHATGPT。读了我的这篇文章后,给我写的英文版

    Title: The little cost savings that are costing America its humanity
    Byline: By [Your Name], [City, State]
    Text:
    When I first arrived in the United States in the 1980s I was moved by something I had never seen before: the small courtesies that made civic life feel humane. Store clerks trusted customers. Service workers treated you like a person. A call to a business usually meant a friendly voice who could actually solve your problem.

    Today those memories feel like a different country. Stores put goods behind locked cases and post security guards at doors. Banks and companies flood our mailboxes with warnings about scams. These changes are disruptive and unpleasant, but tolerable — until you try to make a simple phone call.

    Most companies now put customers through automated trees and AI scripts that can ask for your name, address and membership number and then give a canned response that does not solve anything. If you insist on speaking to a human, you may be routed to a call center thousands of miles away where language barriers, scripts and short time windows leave you guessing and frustrated. If the call drops, you start over. The pain is repeated, banal and corrosive.

    For many of us, a phone call is not an invitation to recite frequently-asked answers — it’s the last resort to solve a real, specific problem. Replacing that interaction with cost-saving automation may show short-term savings on spreadsheets, but it destroys goodwill, alienates customers, and — in my experience — drives people away. If companies really want loyalty, they should invest in human agents empowered to fix problems quickly, not hide behind robotic menus and outsourced scripts.

    This is not only my private complaint. Journalists and consumer surveys have charted a broad decline in customer service in recent years, with automation and cost-cutting often blamed for rising consumer frustration. Restoring accessible, humane service is not merely sentimental: it’s an investment in trust. Companies that advertise “we care” should back that claim by ensuring a human can answer the phone and solve the issue — and by making that option easy to find. I would switch my accounts tomorrow to any bank, insurer or utility that publicly committed to “live-agent first” phone support. That is a stronger business model than many executives realize.

    Policy makers, consumer advocates and company boards should treat customer service as a public good. Regulations can require clear, reachable pathways to human assistance for time-sensitive and complex customer needs. Consumers can vote with their wallets — and with their pens — by filing complaints, writing letters and sharing stories.

    I am not asking for nostalgia. I am asking for accountability, for companies to consider the human cost of the spreadsheets. If we lose the human voice at the other end of the line, we stand to lose something far harder to replace—social trust.



    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 天雅 回复 gugeren

    是的。老板会直接连线服务。有方便也很烦人。有的服务平台,都是连线 sub contractors。比如搬家,找了个评论好的。一登记问价,一下子就来几家不同的服务电话,有点烦。

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 巴黎老高

    正本清源,,,毛幽灵还在天安门上,,,

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 巴黎老高

    洪水来了你怪泥泞坑洼,十多二十年前浑然,不敏感!

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • gugeren

    人工的费用上升,那些服务人员就会削减,正常。

    据前几年的报道,一些服务电话实际上是经过国际长途线路转到印度等外国专门的电话服务中心的,所以有浓重的咖喱味不足为奇。

    现在大概已经用人工智能来解决了,随着人工智能的发展,会越来越好、越来越方便的。

    只是这种电话服务费时间,要等待,不如直接上网去与这些单位联系还快些,例如医院和政府部门。


    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 天雅

    同时银行也不断来信提醒防止诈骗,这可能是拜托大量亚系人涌入的后果。

    ---- 好好的牛肉汤掺了太多水能不变味吗?

    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 天雅

    现在美国除了 FIDELITY。的电话还保持用美国人回电话外,其他差不多都用外国人接电话了。

    ---- 而且说的是听不懂的英语。


    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 天雅

    很多时候不去Walmart 了。近两年又开始去了,很多日用品都被锁进了厨窗,平生最不愿麻烦别人,店里的上货员也找不到。shopping 的心情马上没了。

    屏蔽 举报回复