【美国时事通】关税收益、非法移民、联合国

G博，也许你会对这个系列有兴趣。Masonic D.C. 系列
https://youtu.be/xBUMlsNSP6w?si=c753DxDvxAKGSk7B
https://youtu.be/5qy2cYserJ4?si=fIfRnYOGPas1GdwE
https://youtu.be/K9bn438XITc?si=rtphgnjWX9J-YFbv

---- 里面有提到川普在DC部署JAG的可能深意。

加几个注解：

1】RRN报道，Bill Gates 已经被绞死。

2】Flynn 将军曾任军队情报部门负责人。是他以及几位将军推动川普出来竞选总统的。因此川普背后站着军队不足为奇。

3】这些被绞死的人，都是川普于第一任结束前，与当时的AG一起制订的密封起诉书中的名单里的人，名单仍然根据情况在不断地增加。大部分名单中的人还没有清理干净呢。

看看此博主的回溯事件，川普现在指控对手的一些“罪名”，都是以前对手指控他的。RICO，房贷欺诈，不当文件，etc. 感觉真的是按剧本演戏啊。

https://youtu.be/MieJxKCBCMo?si=gSdhWdEnvfDwG8iR

---- Something Big coming?

阿拉贝拉资助的团体（例如那些进行“公民参与”并实际上提高了民主党投票率的团体）必须突然萎缩。这可能会阻碍民主党在2026年和2028年的基层竞选，尤其是在那些误差幅度操作至关重要的摇摆州。

最重要的是，他们不能为此哭泣，否则就会暴露自己的意图。

简而言之，堵塞阿拉贝拉暗钱污水管道意味着民主党秘密资助/激进主义化粪池基础设施的突然、灾难性中断。恶心！共和党保住了他们的基层捐款；民主党失去了由巨额捐款驱动的机器。

Groups that Arabella underwrote (e.g. those doing “civic engagement” that in practice boosted Democratic turnout) must suddenly shrink. That could hamper Democrats’ ground game in 2026 and 2028, especially in swing states where margin-of-error operations matter most.

Best of all, they can’t cry about it without giving away the game.

In short, plugging up the Arabella dark-money sewer pipeline means a sudden, catastrophic disengagement of the Democrat Party’s secret financing/activism septic infrastructure. Gross! Republicans keep their grassroots donations; Democrats lose their megadonor-fueled machinery.

无论如何，如果美国国际开发署→大型平台（如盖茨基金会）→阿拉贝拉→进步活动家的这条管道最终被切断，其政治影响将是巨大的。阿拉贝拉的财政赞助基金悄悄地支撑了左翼的大部分运营支柱：选民登记团体、气候行动、种族正义非营利组织、教育活动和投票倡议。切断这条管道意味着许多这些团体将失去可靠、集中且基本匿名的资金来源。他们将难以维持现有规模的员工、工资和实地运营。

在过去十年里，阿拉贝拉的网络就像民主党的影子政治机器——就像一个强化版的科赫式网络。没有它，民主党将面临严重的不对称：共和党仍然拥有像WinRed这样的合法小额捐赠引擎，而民主党集中的黑钱机器如今却步履维艰。

However it happens, if that USAID → Mega-platforms (like Gates) → Arabella → progressive activist pipeline is finally switched off, the political effect would be massive. Arabella’s fiscal-sponsor funds have quietly underwritten much of the left’s operational backbone: voter registration groups, climate activism, racial justice nonprofits, education campaigns, and ballot initiatives. Cutting the pipeline means many of those groups would lose dependable, pooled, and largely anonymous funding streams. They’ll struggle to sustain staff, payroll, and field operations at the current scale.

For the last decade, Arabella’s network has functioned as the Democrats’ equivalent of a shadowy political machine — like a Koch-style network on steroids. Without it, Democrats face a major asymmetry: Republicans still have legitimate small-donor engines like WinRed, while Democrats’ pooled dark money machine is now hobbled.

盖茨基金会对此作出解释，发表了一份措辞夸张的声明，坚称其与阿拉贝拉断绝关系的举动只是“一项商业决策，反映了我们对合作伙伴关系和运营模式的定期战略评估”。但这里没什么可看的。

尽管《纽约时报》将盖茨的举动称为“商业决策”，但特朗普针对索罗斯的《反诈骗及腐败组织法》（RICO）的抨击暗示，这整个慈善-政治管道即将被当做犯罪集团来处理。特朗普关于索罗斯和《反诈骗及腐败组织法》的帖子，以及盖茨-阿拉贝拉关系的瓦解，都与同一个网络化融资的“慈善”生态系统息息相关。

By way of explanation, the Gates Foundation excreted a buzzwordy statement insisting that its move to cut ties with Arabella was only “a business decision that reflects our regular strategic assessments of partnerships and operating models.” Nothing to see here.

Whilst the Times pitched Gates’ move as a “business decision,” Trump’s RICO drumbeat against Soros hints that this whole philanthropy-politics pipeline is about to be treated as what it is: a criminal enterprise. Trump’s post about Soros and RICO and the Gates–Arabella unraveling link up at the same networked-funding “philanthropic” ecosystem.