汪翔

注册日期:2009-10-24
访问总量:5174056次

menu网络日志正文menu

从汇丰受罚能不能获得启迪?


发表时间:+-

汇丰银行洗钱的道道

 

汇丰银行因为洗钱被罚19亿美元,成就了又一个历史性的“里程碑”。

出于好奇:汇丰银行应该是没有太大的积极性搞洗钱活动的,再者,洗钱,总得有钱可洗不是,汇丰哪里来那么多值得洗的钱?

细看才知道,原来,银行是为了业务量的扩张,而“不小心”做了在美国司法部看来不应该做的事情:将美国的敌对分子的钱,在自己的金融网络里面转来转去,这里面的钱既有来自毒枭的,也有来自敌对国家或者政治势力的。

即使是像汇丰这样如此小心翼翼经营的银行,也会栽这么大的跟头,那么,在国内习惯了胆大包天做事太久的中国的银行和金融机构,如果要在美国经营的话,日子会是什么样的?结果会不会就是几年之后的破产和让中国的纳税人为此买单呢?

应该是不难想象得到吧。

如果不走出来,或者只是假惺惺的走出来,而实际上走不了什么实际上的大事情,那么,意在走向世界的中国企业,意在世界上打下“强大”想象的中国这个国家,假若你的金融机构都没有办法在海外大玩一把,你又真的能走多远呢?

汇丰的事件,看来,是值得中国的官僚们好好思索一番的。

 

 

HSBC will pay $1.9 billion for money laundering

Kevin McCoy, USA TODAY

8:51AM EST December 11. 2012 - WASHINGTON — British banking giant HSBC said Tuesday that it will pay a record $1.9 billion to settle allegations resulting from a broad international money-laundering investigation by U.S. federal and state authorities.

The settlement, set to be announced later Tuesday by investigators, would end probes focused on accusations that HSBC's U.S. arm transferred billions of dollars through its U.S. arm for Mexican drug cartels, Iran, which is under international financial sanctions, and others.

The settlement, formally known as a deferred prosecution agreement, means HSBC can avoid criminal money laundering and other charges – which could have been a financial death sentence for the bank.

A July report and hearing by the Senate permanent subcommittee in the U.S. alleged foreign HSBC banks "actively circumvented" safeguards at the bank's U.S. arm designed to block transactions involving alleged terrorism, drug trafficking and rogue nations.

One example highlighted in the Senate report showed that two HSBC affiliates routed nearly 25,000 Iran-linked transactions involving $19.4 billion through the bank's U.S. arm over a seven-year period. The transactions allegedly violated U.S. and British law.

"We accept responsibility for our past mistakes. We have said we are profoundly sorry for them, and we do so again," said HSBC Group Chief Executive Stuart Gulliver in a statement released early Tuesday.

Adding that the bank had cooperated with U.S. investigators over the last two years, Gulliver said "we have been taking concrete steps to put right what went wrong."

He said the deferred prosecution agreement notes that in recent years the bank has increased spending and staffing on money-laundering prevention procedures and beefed up its know-your-customer efforts.

HSBC spent over $290 million to remediate its money-laundering prevention policies, terminated 109 banking correspondent relationships considered potential money laundering risks and required a number of senior bank officers return previously paid bonuses, the statement said.

Under the deferred prosecution agreement, the bank said an independent monitor will evaluate HSBC's progress in fully implementing new procedures and ending relationships considered at risk for money laundering.

The agreement covers an investigation that involved the Department of Justice, the Manhattan District Attorney in New York, the Federal Reserve, the Treasury Department's Office of Foreign Assets Control and its financial crimes enforcement unit, and the Comptroller of the Currency.

A U.S. law enforcement official said Monday that HSBC will forfeit $1.25 billion and pay $655 million in civil penalties. The forfeiture of $1.3 billion is a record amount involving a bank. Under the deferred prosecution agreement, HSBC will be accused of violating the Bank Secrecy Act and the Trading With the Enemy Act.

The official spoke on condition of anonymity because the source was not authorized to speak about the matter on the record.

Under the deferred prosecution agreement, the bank won't be prosecuted if it meets certain conditions, including stronger internal controls to prevent money laundering. Such agreements have been used often by Justice to settle allegations of foreign bribery charges against large corporations.

In regard to HSBC and Mexico, a U.S. Senate investigative committee reported that in 2007 and 2008, HSBC Mexico sent about $7 billion in chase to the United States. The committee report said that such a large an amount of cash strongly suggested they were illegal drug proceeds.

Money laundering by banks has become a priority target for U.S. law enforcement.

In another case Monday, British bank Standard Chartered, accused of scheming with the Iranian government to launder billions of dollars, signed an agreement with New York regulators to pay $340 million to settle money laundering charges.

Since 2009, foreign banks with U.S. arms, including Credit Suisse, Barclays and Lloyds, have made payments to settle allegations they moved money for people or companies that were a U.S. sanctions list. Because these banks had U.S. subsidiaries, they are subject to U.S. laws and regulations.

Last summer, the Senate investigation concluded that HSBC's lax controls exposed it to the risks of money laundering and terrorist financing.

HSBC bank affiliates also skirted U.S. government bans against financial transactions with Iran and other countries, according to the report from the Senate permanent subcommittee on Investigations. And HSBC's U.S. division provided money and banking services to some banks in Saudi Arabia and Bangladesh reported to have helped fund al-Qaeda and other terrorist groups, the report said.

The report also blamed U.S. regulators: It said they failed to take action even though they had knowledge that HSBC's money- laundering prevention system was inadequate.

Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., the subcommittee chairman, cited instances in which regulatory sanctions required HSBC to fix deficiencies. The bank allegedly didn't follow through, the subcommittee's report said.

Levin also said the Comptroller of the Currency, the U.S. agency that oversees the biggest banks, tolerated HSBC's weak controls against money laundering for years and that agency superiors overruled examiners who raised concerns about the situation.

In his statement Tuesday, HSBC's Gulliver said: "The HSBC of today is a fundamentally different organization from the one that made those mistakes. Over the last two years, under new senior leadership, we have been taking concrete steps to put right what went wrong and to participate actively with government authorities in bringing to light and addressing these matters."

HSBC announced Monday that Robert Werner, a former head of the Treasury Department agencies responsible for sanctions against terrorist financing and money laundering, will begin a new role at HSBC as head of financial crime compliance and become the bank's money-laundering reporting officer. Werner has been head of global standards assurance since August.

In January, HSBC hired Stuart Levey, a former Treasury undersecretary for terrorism and financial intelligence, as its chief legal officer. And a former policy adviser in the Obama administration, Preeta Bansal, in October became HSBC's global general counsel for litigation and regulatory affairs.

 

浏览(1205)
thumb_up(1)
评论(8)
  • 当前共有8条评论
  • 汪翔
    黑河人:

    看名字,你似乎是黑龙江人?
    咱们南方人就是“秀气”和“温和”,
    不是吗?!
    哈哈。

    没有人会因此生气,否则,肚量也太小了。
    只是好奇。
    你也同时因此而给我提了个醒,
    让我自己适当注意一下“文风”。
    谢谢来访,继续关注。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 黑河人
    sorry 博主。可能是本人眼拙,把你与另一位博主混淆了不过,您老别顾忌,你的文字比较中性偏男。不大像北方人。也许是年轻吧不到48?

    一个企业如果帐目不清,就很难搞一个适当的规划和预算。如中国之大,帐目不清造成的系统混乱和失调就更加难以处理。美国或西方大国包括小城新加坡在银行金融管理方面很严。即便有事也有把握处理,包括2008挑破泡沫放倒几个大个子。估计那都是设计的。

    祝好!
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 汪翔
    黑河人:

    同意。中国的金融体系真正的是问题多多。
    而且自己还在自信和得意,
    被国内得益于垄断的“长期”“机会”给惯坏了。
    三十年的最大失落到底在哪里?
    倒是一个很值得反思的议题。

    不过,有点好奇:
    我的文字真的很“女人气”吗?
    那么温柔和细腻?还是太“小家子”气?
    难道真的没有男人的“霸气”?!
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 黑河人
    问候博主才女并西岸大侠。汇丰可能是华人(拥有或存钱最多)的银行。

    历史剧咱们只能看一小段。如果某人社会或历史位置特殊点儿如码字快手数学家庄锐博,则可看得更宽一点更深一点。

    上帝确实存在。华人叫的上帝与西人称的God,都不含糊,令人类世界的发展非常有意思。活在美国确实比较舒心自在。远望故土的时候视野自然变得宽广了,少了一些身在此山中的因素,以对同类关爱的本能,批判的则是更加真诚。

    谈到博主的议题,如果中国的政治体制仍然保持如此摸改特色,而银行和整个金融体系基本照搬西方模式(特别是那些容易学的快利或面上功夫),那就很难有独立自主的经济体系。在维护金融独立方面似乎比俄国人差很多。而一旦失去独立性(大比例股份外放),便极难转变获得主动。从政府层面上看,愚人估计这30多年来最失败的可能是银行或金融体系的建设。以至宏观和微观的资产管理能力薄弱,以房价及腐败失控为例,明显是漏洞太多太大。简单的实名制都没有做到。相当于基础虚松不实,再这样的基础上做国民经济管理岂不还是会积重难返?

    好了,就此打住。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 汪翔
    西岸:

    你说的也有它的道理。
    只是,在美国,实际上很可能没有你所说的那么“势利”。
    美国还是比较看重事实的国家。

    汇丰遭灾的具体细节,还不是这里强调的。
    我强调的是:这么谨小慎微的银行都栽这么大的跟斗,
    中国国内已经习惯了大小有机会都要随心所欲“捞一笔”的金融机构,
    如果在美国经营,结果会是什么呢?
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 汪翔
    黑河人:

    您喜欢就好。
    我就是想实实在在的给自己捞点信息。
    也附带的给旁观者捞点。
    哈哈。不小心时不时注意到一点有价值的。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 西岸
    其实不是什么特别的事情,只是政府抓不抓的问题。
    所涉及的洗钱,是发生在美国的事情,而不是其他地方的事情,所以美国政府才能干涉。
    而毒品因为市场在美国,而且都是现金交易,因此才会形成洗钱。而洗钱往往是通过合法生意,比如洗衣店(老中黑帮),加油站(老墨),这些生意把经营的收益存入银行,其中有部分是黑钱(这类生意的特点是现金交易量高,而现金是无法区分属于正常生意收入,还是非法生意收入),进入银行的钱是正常给政府交税,因此一旦进了银行就成为干净的。
    因此任何这类生意,都可能是DEA监督的对象,看你的实际收益与你的可能收益是否吻合,差的太大就有洗钱嫌疑。所以任何洗钱最终都是在银行结束。
    但银行是很难知道来存钱和转钱的生意是否是非法,因为政府不可能告诉银行,否则也就别破案了。
    当然,这个矛盾产生的罪责的解释权在政府,不在银行。
    伊朗问题,是同样的事情,不过生意变成了慈善组织,即美国伊朗人通过美国伊朗人办的慈善组织把钱送到伊朗,名义当然是慈善事业。也许是用于慈善,也许是其他非法事情,但客观上都是对伊朗有利,因此如今就是问题。
    不过慈善组织这件事,美国政府一般有黑名单,并且有可能按照程序告诉银行系统,而银行仍然与其有往来,那就是知法犯法了。但假如没有告知银行呢?
    这个判罚不过就是一个协议的结果,是汇丰根据官司成本而做的选择,否则可能在结案之前被冻结业务,哪怕无罪,那么损失就不是罚款/不罚款所能covered。
    其实就是政府杀一儆百的勾当,不能是太小的银行,否则没有震动意义。
    如果汇丰是美国银行,十有八九会没事,就如08金融危机的时候,美国政府就是不救百年老店Layman Brothers,而是救高盛等类似,因为后者是美国的公司,前者是英国人的(高盛在这次危机中不是一般的赚,几十亿的非法交易被揭穿了也只是被罚两千万了事)。
    其实美国政府可以跟踪黑钱走向,也是通过银行的洗钱渠道的,所谓放长线钓大鱼的干活。就是需要银行进行洗钱活动,哪怕是无意的。
    最直接的例子就是如今在国会作证的联邦调查局为了跟踪墨西哥边境的毒品战争的武器走向,给毒贩送了两吨的武器,结果用来杀害美国的边境警察和缉毒警察,FBI成为国会追究责任的对象。
    其实就是解释权在谁的问题,这个事情你是逃不掉的,我说你非法你就是非法。
    而你不可能不非法,因为你可能不知道你非法。
    当然也有另一种可能,就是银行具体业务人员为了吸引资金而自己决定与谁交易,或干脆就是黑钱收买的卧底。
    那么是否与银行有关系,解释权不在银行。
    屏蔽 举报回复
  • 黑河人
    博主好!

    您老眼毒!点评些事儿,比万维上的另一个才女实在。其实为什么是汇丰而不是大通才是更大的问号。

    中国的百姓如同活在养猪场里,银行归谁管早就说不清了。结果是受哈佛培训学新加坡?粮食金融都被外人操控,新朝还是继续改革,路在石头上?

    上帝创造万物。我们天生有罪。接受吧。?。

    这个链接也许值得一看。

    http://hexinbbs.blog.163.com/blog/static/161910300201211105125212/
    屏蔽 举报回复