满足需求还是隐藏欲望？一项关于人工智能性爱机器人在残疾人服务领域应用的定性研究
满足需求还是隐藏欲望？一项关于人工智能性爱机器人在残疾人服务领域应用的定性研究
Solving needs or hiding desires? A qualitative study of AI-Powered sex robots in disability services
—《性教育》，2026年10月26日在线发表—
【摘要】智力障碍人士在表达性需求时，面临着根深蒂固的系统性与文化性障碍；在中国文化背景下，这些障碍往往因“面子”观念和“家族主义”而进一步加剧。尽管人工智能及人形性爱机器人被视为潜在的干预手段，但它们在残疾人服务领域中的伦理与实践可行性仍存在争议。本研究采用解释现象学分析法（IPA），探讨了12位中国社会工作者对于引入人工智能亲密技术的看法。研究发现四个主要主题：在追求亲密关系自主权方面所面临的系统性障碍；“无风险”模拟亲密关系所带来的预期益处；关于人际关系真实性的伦理顾虑；以及对“永恒儿童”这一刻板印象的社会反思。从业者认为，机器人可作为一种工具，通过消除怀孕和遭受剥削的风险，从而绕过家长的反对及机构可能承担的责任。然而，一个关键的矛盾随之浮现：这些技术究竟是真正赋予了使用者自主权，还是仅仅作为一种“技术性补救措施”，旨在将残疾人的性需求从主流（神经典型）公众的视野中“遮蔽”起来？研究结果揭示了一种“准备程度的双重标准”，即认知能力被用作限制残疾人享有基本人权的门槛。我们主张建立一个多学科治理框架，优先培养“技术-社会”素养，并挑战当前服务模式中固有的“性能力歧视”（sexual ableism）。
【关键词】智力障碍；性；中国文化；性爱机器人；性能力歧视
[Abstract] Individuals with intellectual disabilities face entrenched systemic and cultural barriers to sexual expression, often exacerbated in Chinese contexts by values of ‘face’ and ‘familism’. While artificial intelligence and humanoid sex robots emerge as potential interventions, their ethical and practical viability within disability services remains contested. This study employed Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis to explore the perspectives of 12 Chinese social workers regarding the integration of AI-powered intimate technologies. Findings reveal four major themes: systemic barriers to romantic agency, the perceived benefits of ‘risk-free’ simulated intimacy, ethical concerns regarding relational authenticity, and societal reflections on the ‘eternal child’ syndrome. Practitioners recognised robots as tools to bypass parental opposition and institutional liability by eliminating risks of pregnancy and exploitation. However, a critical tension emerged: whether these technologies genuinely empower users or serve as a ‘techno-fix’ to hide disabled sexuality from the neurotypical public. The results highlight a ‘double standard of readiness’, where cognitive competence is used to gatekeep human rights. We argue for a multidisciplinary governance framework that prioritises ‘techno-social’ literacy and challenges the sexual ableism inherent in current service models.
[Key words] Intellectual disabilitiessexualityChinese culturesex robotsexual ableism
论文原文：Angus Yuk Kit Lam, Benjamin C. H. Fung, Ben C. B. Yip, et al. (2026). Solving needs or hiding desires? A qualitative study of AI-Powered sex robots in disability services. Sex Education, Published online: 26 Oct 2026.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14681811.2026.2754833
（翻译兼责任编辑：MARY）
（需要英文原文的朋友，请联系微信：millerdeng95或iacmsp）
